us-technology

The Casio G-Shock GD-010GB-1A9JF (pictured) has a tinted gold LCD and polished bezel ring. (Image source: G-Central) Casio is reportedly launching a new GD-010 series G-Shock in black and gold, with a large tinted LCD, 10-year battery, and metallic gold ring. It is scheduled for an August 2025 launch in Japan, priced at ¥15,950 (~$107.4). Black and gold has long been a G-Shock signature – from early 1980s releases to limited-edition drops in recent years. Now, that same classic contrast is reportedly returning with the new Casio GD-010GB-1A9, a fresh addition to the large-format GD-010 lineup. As evident by a new report from G-Central, the upcoming GD-010GB-1A9 has a tinted gold LCD and polished bezel ring, which in essence is the same crowd-pleasing color scheme that’s been used since the 1980s. With the GD-010GB-1A9, Casio appears to be modernizing that same design using the relatively affordable GD-010 platform. This is a series that stands out because of its oversized case, reverse LCD variants, and a front-positioned illumination button. Unlike some other models in this series, the GD-010GB-1A9 utilizes a positive LCD with high-contrast digits, which makes outdoor readability far easier. From the image, the model features a prominent metallic gold bezel ring and gold G-Shock branding at the top. Its face displays day, date, and time in a spacious format, along with labels for alarm, mute, and signal indicators. As expected, the case structure and button layout mirrors past GD-010 models. It also sports the signature “10 year battery” text near the bottom. The source further reports that the GD-010GB-1A9JF is scheduled to launch in Japan in August 2025 with a listed price of ¥15,950 (~$107.4). At present, there’s no confirmation of a global release. In the meantime, you can check out the Casio G-Shock GD-010-1A1 – now $86 on Amazon. Related Articles Anubhav Sharma – Tech Writer – 825 articles published on Notebookcheck since 2024 Fueled by a childhood spent taking apart video game consoles to see how they worked, I turned my passion for tech into writing. I have a double Bachelor’s in Computer Science Engineering (2018) and English (2024). I’ve been writing on a variety of tech topics since 2016, with a particular interest in gaming. When I’m not hunting down the latest tech news, you’ll find me producing music, gaming, or hiking. Anubhav Sharma, 2025-07-20 (Update: 2025-07-20) Read More

F1 24 1920×1080 Ultra High Preset AA:T AF:16x NVIDIA GeForce RTX 5070 Founders EditionIntel Core i9-14900K, NVIDIA GeForce RTX 5070 138.8 (105min, 107P1) fps +21% MSI Vector A18 HX A9WAMD Ryzen 9 9955HX, Nvidia GeForce RTX 5070 Ti Laptop 114.8 (81min, 88P1) fps Razer Blade 14 2025AMD Ryzen AI 9 365, Nvidia GeForce RTX 5070 Laptop 86.6 (52min, 60P1) fps -25% Asus ProArt P16 H7606WPAMD Ryzen AI 9 HX 370, Nvidia GeForce RTX 5070 Laptop 80.7 (46min, 55P1) fps -30% Gigabyte Aero X16 1WHAMD Ryzen AI 7 350, Nvidia GeForce RTX 5070 Laptop 77.7 (60min, 61P1) fps -32% 2560×1440 Ultra High Preset AA:T AF:16x NVIDIA GeForce RTX 5070 Founders EditionIntel Core i9-14900K, NVIDIA GeForce RTX 5070 90.1 (74min, 74P1) fps +25% MSI Vector A18 HX A9WAMD Ryzen 9 9955HX, Nvidia GeForce RTX 5070 Ti Laptop 72.1 (57min, 58P1) fps Razer Blade 14 2025AMD Ryzen AI 9 365, Nvidia GeForce RTX 5070 Laptop 53.5 (45min, 43P1) fps -26% Asus ProArt P16 H7606WPAMD Ryzen AI 9 HX 370, Nvidia GeForce RTX 5070 Laptop 51.1 (41min, 41P1) fps -29% Gigabyte Aero X16 1WHAMD Ryzen AI 7 350, Nvidia GeForce RTX 5070 Laptop 48.7 (30min, 38P1) fps -32% 3840×2160 Ultra High Preset AA:T AF:16x NVIDIA GeForce RTX 5070 Founders EditionIntel Core i9-14900K, NVIDIA GeForce RTX 5070 45.1 (39min, 38P1) fps +27% MSI Vector A18 HX A9WAMD Ryzen 9 9955HX, Nvidia GeForce RTX 5070 Ti Laptop 35.6 (30min, 30P1) fps Gigabyte Aero X16 1WHAMD Ryzen AI 7 350, Nvidia GeForce RTX 5070 Laptop 15.5 (10min, 12P1) fps -56% 3840×2160 Ultra High Preset + Quality DLSS AF:16x NVIDIA GeForce RTX 5070 Founders EditionIntel Core i9-14900K, NVIDIA GeForce RTX 5070 77.3 (65min, 65P1) fps +26% MSI Vector A18 HX A9WAMD Ryzen 9 9955HX, Nvidia GeForce RTX 5070 Ti Laptop 61.4 (52min, 51P1) fps Gigabyte Aero X16 1WHAMD Ryzen AI 7 350, Nvidia GeForce RTX 5070 Laptop 18.9 (10min, 15P1) fps -69% Dota 2 Reborn 1920×1080 ultra (3/3) best looking MSI Vector A18 HX A9WAMD Ryzen 9 9955HX, Nvidia GeForce RTX 5070 Ti Laptop 193 (156.6min) fps MSI Katana 17 HX B14WGKIntel Core i7-14650HX, Nvidia GeForce RTX 5070 Laptop 149.3 (125.4min) fps -23% Gigabyte Gaming A16 GA6HIntel Core i7-13620H, Nvidia GeForce RTX 5070 Laptop 148.7 (124.4min) fps -23% Razer Blade 14 2025AMD Ryzen AI 9 365, Nvidia GeForce RTX 5070 Laptop 137.6 (116.8min) fps -29% Gigabyte Aero X16 1WHAMD Ryzen AI 7 350, Nvidia GeForce RTX 5070 Laptop 131.9 (113.9min) fps -32% Asus ProArt P16 H7606WPAMD Ryzen AI 9 HX 370, Nvidia GeForce RTX 5070 Laptop 130.9 (111.6min) fps -32% 3840×2160 ultra (3/3) best looking MSI Vector A18 HX A9WAMD Ryzen 9 9955HX, Nvidia GeForce RTX 5070 Ti Laptop 170.7 (129.7min) fps Monster Hunter Wilds 1920×1080 ultra, RT: high, no upscaling MSI Vector A18 HX A9WAMD Ryzen 9 9955HX, Nvidia GeForce RTX 5070 Ti Laptop 70.8 fps 2560×1440 ultra, RT: high, no upscaling MSI Vector A18 HX A9WAMD Ryzen 9 9955HX, Nvidia GeForce RTX 5070 Ti Laptop 55 fps 2560×1440 ultra, RT: high, DLSS3 quality MSI Vector A18 HX A9WAMD Ryzen 9 9955HX, Nvidia GeForce RTX 5070 Ti Laptop 70.6 fps 3840×2160 ultra, RT: high, no upscaling MSI Vector A18 HX A9WAMD Ryzen 9 9955HX, Nvidia GeForce RTX 5070 Ti Laptop 33.4 fps Strange Brigade 1920×1080 ultra AA:ultra AF:16 MSI Vector A18 HX A9WAMD Ryzen 9 9955HX, Nvidia GeForce RTX 5070 Ti Laptop 347 (134.3min, 254P1) fps Razer Blade 14 2025AMD Ryzen AI 9 365, Nvidia GeForce RTX 5070 Laptop 258 (53.6min, 127.9P1) fps -26% Asus ProArt P16 H7606WPAMD Ryzen AI 9 HX 370, Nvidia GeForce RTX 5070 Laptop 247 (102.7min, 187.2P1) fps -29% Gigabyte Aero X16 1WHAMD Ryzen AI 7 350, Nvidia GeForce RTX 5070 Laptop 234 (141.3min, 180P1) fps -33% Gigabyte Gaming A16 GA6HIntel Core i7-13620H, Nvidia GeForce RTX 5070 Laptop 203 (108.3min, 150.5P1) fps -41% 2560×1440 ultra AA:ultra AF:16 MSI Vector A18 HX A9WAMD Ryzen 9 9955HX, Nvidia GeForce RTX 5070 Ti Laptop 246 (161.1min, 195P1) fps Razer Blade 14 2025AMD Ryzen AI 9 365, Nvidia GeForce RTX 5070 Laptop 172.7 (112.2min, 129.3P1) fps -30% Asus ProArt P16 H7606WPAMD Ryzen AI 9 HX 370, Nvidia GeForce RTX 5070 Laptop 166.6 (97.1min, 136.2P1) fps -32% Gigabyte Aero X16 1WHAMD Ryzen AI 7 350, Nvidia GeForce RTX 5070 Laptop 164.2 (119.9min, 134.4P1) fps -33% Gigabyte Gaming A16 GA6HIntel Core i7-13620H, Nvidia GeForce RTX 5070 Laptop 149.7 (58min, 119.6P1) fps -39% 3840×2160 ultra AA:ultra AF:16 MSI Vector A18 HX A9WAMD Ryzen 9 9955HX, Nvidia GeForce RTX 5070 Ti Laptop 131.7 (92.7min, 115P1) fps Gigabyte Aero X16 1WHAMD Ryzen AI 7 350, Nvidia GeForce RTX 5070 Laptop 90.3 (76.7min, 80.7P1) fps -31% Baldur’s Gate 3 1920×1080 Ultra Preset AA:T MSI Vector A18 HX A9WAMD Ryzen 9 9955HX, Nvidia GeForce RTX 5070 Ti Laptop 246.1 fps NVIDIA GeForce RTX 5070 Founders EditionIntel Core i9-14900K, NVIDIA GeForce RTX 5070 186.8 (118.7min, 119.1P0.1, 119.7P1) fps -24% Razer Blade 14 2025AMD Ryzen AI 9 365, Nvidia GeForce RTX 5070 Laptop 128.4 fps -48% Asus ProArt P16 H7606WPAMD Ryzen AI 9 HX 370, Nvidia GeForce RTX 5070 Laptop 127.3 fps -48% Gigabyte Aero X16 1WHAMD Ryzen AI 7 350, Nvidia GeForce RTX 5070 Laptop 109.4 fps -56% Gigabyte Gaming A16 GA6HIntel Core i7-13620H, Nvidia GeForce RTX 5070 Laptop 103.5 (42min, 54.2P0.1, 81.7P1) fps -58% MSI Katana 17 HX B14WGKIntel Core i7-14650HX, Nvidia GeForce RTX 5070 Laptop 101.3 (53.4min, 76.1P0.1, 85.7P1) fps -59% 2560×1440 Ultra Preset AA:T MSI Vector A18 HX A9WAMD Ryzen 9 9955HX, Nvidia GeForce RTX 5070 Ti Laptop 175.5 fps NVIDIA GeForce RTX 5070 Founders EditionIntel Core i9-14900K, NVIDIA GeForce RTX 5070 132 (79.9min, 79.9P0.1, 80P1) fps -25% Razer Blade 14 2025AMD Ryzen AI 9 365, Nvidia GeForce RTX 5070 Laptop 89.4 fps -49% Asus ProArt P16 H7606WPAMD Ryzen AI 9 HX 370, Nvidia GeForce RTX 5070 Laptop 88.4 fps -50% MSI Katana 17 HX B14WGKIntel Core i7-14650HX, Nvidia GeForce RTX 5070 Laptop 82.5 (57.9min, 66.6P0.1, 74.1P1) fps -53% Gigabyte Aero X16 1WHAMD Ryzen AI 7 350, Nvidia GeForce RTX 5070 Laptop 75.8 fps -57% Gigabyte Gaming A16 GA6HIntel Core i7-13620H,

Specifications Display 6.55 inch 19.5:9, 2736 x 1264 pixel 460 PPI, Capacitive Touchscreen, OLED, 3.840 Hz PWM-Dimming, glossy: yes, HDR, 120 Hz Storage 512 GB UFS 3.1 Flash, 512 GB  , 483.58 GB free Connections 1 USB 2.0, USB-C Power Delivery (PD), 1 Infrared, Audio Connections: USB-C, 1 Fingerprint Reader, NFC, Brightness Sensor, Sensors: Accelerometer, Compass, Ultra-Sonic-Proximity, OTG Networking 802.11 a/b/g/n/ac/ax (a/b/g/n = Wi-Fi 4/ac = Wi-Fi 5/ax = Wi-Fi 6/), Bluetooth 5.4, 2G (850, 900, 1800, 1900 MHz), 3G (Band 1, 2, 4, 5, 6, 8, 19), LTE (Band 1, 2, 3, 4, 5, 8, 12, 17, 18, 19, 20, 26, 28, 34, 38, 39, 40, 41), 5G-Sub6 (Band 1, 3, 5, 8, 28, 38, 41, 77, 78, 79), Dual SIM, LTE, 5G, GPS Size height x width x depth (in mm): 7.3 x 156.5 x 74.6 ( = 0.29 x 6.16 x 2.94 in) Battery 5300 mAh Lithium-Polymer, Silicon-Carbon-Anode Charging fast charging / Quickcharge Operating System Android 15 Camera Primary Camera: 200 MPix (f/1.9, OIS) + 12 MPix (Ultra Wide, f/2.2); Camera2-API-Level: Level 3Secondary Camera: 50 MPix (f/2.0) Additional features Speakers: Dual, Keyboard: Onscreen, USB-Cabel, SIM-Tool, MagicOS 9.0, 24 Months Warranty, Bluetooth Audio Codecs: SBC, AAC, LDAC, aptX, aptX HD | GNSS: GPS (L1), Glonass (L1), BeiDou (B1I, B1C), Galileo (E1), QZSS (L1) | HDR: HLG, HDR10, HDR10+ | DRM Widevine L1 | eSIM | IP65 | Body-SAR: – W/kg, Head-SAR: – W/kg | max. charging speed: 66 W (wired), fanless Weight 184 g ( = 6.49 oz / 0.41 pounds) ( = 0 oz / 0 pounds) Price comparison Average Score: 85.25% – goodAverage of 2 scores (from 1 reviews) price: – %, performance: 42%, features: 48%, display: 93% mobility: 91%, workmanship: 88%, ergonomy: 79%, emissions: 93% Reviews for the Honor 400 80.5% Powerful total package with bargain potential – Honor 400 smartphone review | NotebookcheckDuring our test, the Honor 400 proved to be a fairly compact mid-range smartphone with a good camera, long-lasting battery, impressive AI functions and long update support. However, you’ll still need to take into account a few compromises. 90% Beeindruckende Kamera und starke Leistung zum MittelklassepreisSource: PC Welt DE→EN Single Review, online available, Long, Date: 06/04/2025Rating: Total score: 90% Comment Qualcomm Adreno 720: Graphics chip for smartphones and tablets, integrated in the Qualcomm Snapdragon 7 Gen 3 SoC. Modern games should be playable with these graphics cards at low settings and resolutions. Casual gamers may be happy with these cards. » Further information can be found in our Comparison of Mobile Graphics Cards and the corresponding Benchmark List. SD 7 Gen 3: Mid-range SoC with 8 Kryo cores (1x ARM Cortex-A715 2.63 GHz prime core, 3x ARM Cortex A715 2.4 GHz performance cluster, 4x ARM Cortex A510 with 1.8 efficiency cluster) and an X63 5G modem. The chip is manufactured using the modern 4nm process.» Further information can be found in our Comparison of Mobile Processsors. 6.55″: It is a small display format for smartphones. You shouldn’t be severely defective in vision, and you won’t see much detail on the screen and only have a small resolution available. For that, the device should be small and handy, easy to transport. » To find out how fine a display is, see our DPI List. Honor: In 2014 Huawei created the sub brand Honor and offers certain smartphone series under this name. Occasionally the products are also called Huawei Honor. The market share of Honor products is manageable, but there are several reviews on Honor smartphones with average ratings (as of 2016). 85.25%: This is an above-average rating. Nevertheless, it should not be forgotten that about one fifth of all tested models receive a better rating. » Further information can be found in our Notebook Purchase Guide. Read More

Specifications Display 6.92 inch 20.5:9, 2460 x 1080 pixel 388 PPI, Capacitive, AMOLED, 120 Hz Connections USB-C Power Delivery (PD), 1 Infrared, Card Reader: microSD, 1 Fingerprint Reader, NFC, Sensors: accelerometer, gyro, proximity, compass, barometer Networking 802.11 a/b/g/n/ac/ax (a/b/g/n = Wi-Fi 4/ac = Wi-Fi 5/ax = Wi-Fi 6/), Bluetooth 5, GSM, CDMA, UMTS, LTE, 5G, Dual SIM, GPS Size height x width x depth (in mm): 34 x 185.5 x 85.5 ( = 1.34 x 7.3 x 3.37 in) Operating System Android 15 Camera Primary Camera: 50 MPix TripleSecondary Camera: 32 MPix Additional features Keyboard: OnScreen Price comparison Reviews for the Ulefone Armor 33 Pro Ulefone Armor 33 Pro – recenzja, test i opiniaSource: Unite4buy PL→ENPositive: Nice dual displays; decent hardware; high performance; impressive battery life; quick 66W charging; great cameras; waterproof IP68; NFC module; 5G; gyroscope. Negative: Heavy and bulky; No OIS; high price. Single Review, online available, Medium, Date: 03/12/2025 Comment ARM Mali-G615 MP2: Mid-range graphics chip for smartphones with 2 of the 6 possible cores. Based on the fourth generation of Valhall architecture. Offers variable rate shading. Non demanding games should be playable with these graphics cards. » Further information can be found in our Comparison of Mobile Graphics Cards and the corresponding Benchmark List. Dimensity 7300X: The Dimensity 7300X is a mid-range processor with an integrated 5G modem. The CPU part integrates four ARM Cortex-A78 cores with up to 2.5 GHz and four Cortex-A55 power cores with up to 2 GHz. The SoC is manufactured using the modern 4nm process. Compared to the Dimensity 7300, the 7300X is intended for devices for multiple displays like foldable smartphones.» Further information can be found in our Comparison of Mobile Processsors. 6.92″: It is a small display format for smartphones. You shouldn’t be severely defective in vision, and you won’t see much detail on the screen and only have a small resolution available. For that, the device should be small and handy, easy to transport. » To find out how fine a display is, see our DPI List. Ulefone: Shenzhen Ulefone Technology Co, Ltd is a Chinese company that specializes in manufacturing smartphones. The company was founded in 2014 and has since launched a variety of Android smartphones. However, before 2014, it was already a manufacturer for other brands (OEM). » Further information can be found in our Notebook Purchase Guide. Devices from a different Manufacturer and/or with a different CPU Devices with the same GPU and/or Screen Size Devices with Same Screen Size and/or Weight Stefan Hinum (Update: 2025-07-20) Read More

Russ from Retro Game Corps holds the Ayaneo Pocket S2, displaying the title screen of Horizon Chase and showcasing the device’s display and ergonomic design. (Image source: Retro Game Corps) The Ayaneo Pocket S2 held up impressively through a 100-hour stress test, delivering stable performance, strong emulation across PSP, PS2, Switch, and even Windows titles, with excellent thermals and build durability. While not a major leap in raw power, its biggest strengths lie in improved compatibility, refined controls, and long-lasting battery life. Ayaneo Pocket S2 was just put through a brutal 100-hour stress test by Russ from Retro Game Corps. And surprisingly, it didn’t overheat, throttle, or fall apart. Over the course of testing, the Ayaneo Pocket S2 held up remarkably well in real-world gaming, even if its performance bump over earlier Ayaneo models like the Pocket Evo and Pocket S wasn’t groundbreaking. God of War: Chains of Olympus, via PSP emulation, ran flawlessly at 6x resolution for over 8 hours on eco mode. Metal Gear Solid 3, via PS2 emulation, held steady at 3.5x upscaled resolution for 5.5 hours in balanced mode.  The handheld also handled more demanding platforms well. Nintendo Switch emulation through the Eden emulator delivered solid results, with Donkey Kong Country: Tropical Freeze running in docked mode at 1080p resolution for almost 5 hours. Even Windows gaming via Winlator worked really well, as Prince of Persia (2008) averaged 57 FPS at 720p high settings while lasting 4.5 hours. However, Russ emphasized that these performance achievements came with important caveats. Geekbench 6 scores between the new Pocket S2 and the previous-generation Pocket Evo showed minimal differences, with single-core performance, crucial for emulation, remaining “almost identical.” Ayaneo Pocket S2 (top) and Ayaneo Pocket Evo (bottom) displaying Geekbench 6 CPU benchmark results, showing higher single-core and multi-core scores on the Pocket S2. (Image source: Retro Game Corps) While 3D Mark Wildlife Extreme tests revealed approximately 20% graphics improvement, Russ concluded it wasn’t “a huge leap” and questioned whether the gains justified upgrading from previous Ayaneo devices given the premium pricing. Instead, he noted that “the bigger upgrade here has more to do with the hardware improvements like the analog sticks and D-pad” rather than raw computational power. For retro gaming fans, the Pocket S2 delivered where it mattered. Donkey Kong Country on SNES ran over 11 hours with heavy CRT Royale shaders, showing off solid battery life and headroom. But the real upgrade for Ayaneo Pocket S2 was the compatibility. The original Pocket S used a Snapdragon G3X Gen 2, which wasn’t widely supported, causing major issues with Android games and emulators. Users often had to spoof the device just to get things running. The new G3 Gen 3 chipset has largely eliminated these compatibility headaches. Russ noted that while the device retains spoofing capabilities for edge cases, he “did not have to use that at all” during his three-week testing period. Instead, “most of these games have just worked just fine out of the box with the maximum settings.” The only notable exception was Diablo Immortal, which limited settings to high instead of ultra, though Russ chose to accept this limitation rather than risk account bans through spoofing. Russ from Retro Game Corps holding the Ayaneo Pocket S2 handheld console running a Wii U emulator, with the device shown prominently in a living room setting. (Image source: Retro Game Corps) However, testing still revealed minor compatibility problems typical of early-stage emulation, including occasional frame drops during cutscenes in Super Mario Sunshine and visual artifacts in newer titles like Dragon Quest 3 HD 2D Remake, limitations that appear tied to emulator development rather than the hardware itself. Thermally, the results seemed impressive. With the fan curve dialed to “High,” not “Max,” the device rarely exceeded 45°C on surface temperature, and internal readings stayed under 75°C even while emulating Nintendo Switch games. Russ observed no thermal throttling, and CPU/GPU frequency logs confirmed consistent performance over time. Surprisingly, the material on the hall effect sticks, face buttons, or the replaceable D-pad did not degrade over the course of 100 hours. The aluminum chassis held up with zero heat discoloration or warping, while the screen, despite being LCD and limited to 60Hz, remained responsive and color-accurate even after hours of use in high-brightness mode. However, wear and tear did appear in subtle ways. The soft plastic shell around the triggers began to show micro scuffs, and some users might notice a minor squeak on the right analog stick if frequently swapped with third-party caps. Do watch the full Ayaneo Pocket S2 review video linked below for a detailed breakdown. ▶ load Youtube video Related Articles Anmol Dubey – Tech Writer – 37 articles published on Notebookcheck since 2025 Anmol is the guy who once tamed an entire Instagram channel solo, turned branding into an art form, and could probably benchmark your smartphone blindfolded. By day, he’s a data scientist decoding client chaos. By night, he’s a tech influencer who knows most companies’ product lineups better than their own teams. Somewhere in between, he’s playing Borderlands, Elden Ring, The Witcher 3, and every other action RPG he can get his hands on. Anmol Dubey, 2025-07-20 (Update: 2025-07-20) Read More

Lenovo ThinkPad E16 G3 (image source: Notebookcheck) Lenovo further improved its budget office laptop ThinkPad E16 G3 and the result is a really good office laptop that does not break the bank. The new 120 Hz screen in particular is an excellent choice for productive tasks. Lenovo’s E-series ThinkPads are affordable office laptops that cover all the basic needs and offer good price-performance ratios. This is also true for the new 16-inch model ThinkPad E16 G3 and Lenovo improved the notebook in some important aspects. Our in-depth review did not show any real weak spots for the new model equipped with the small Arrow Lake processor Intel Core Ultra 5 225U. You get a decent chassis, sufficient number of ports, comfortable input devices and even decent speakers. The battery runtime is also very good. The CPU performance of the Arrow Lake processor is completely sufficient for regular office tasks, but the GPU performance is very low. If you need a faster iGPU, you can get the E16 G3 with one of the two faster CPU options (Core Ultra 5 225H or Core Ultra 7 255H), which are equipped with the much faster iGPU models Arc Graphics 130T/140T. The fan is usually very quiet and you can install up to 128 GB RAM.  After Lenovo already upped its display game in the consumer segment, you now also get a new optional screen for the ThinkPad E16. For an additional charge of 70 Euros compared to the default 300-nits Full-HD screen, you can get a high-resolution WQHD panel with 400 nits, full sRGB coverage, good color accuracy, as well as a refresh rate of 120 Hz. The matte panel does not suffer from PWM flickering and even offers fast response times. All in all, this panel is a great choice for productive workloads. If you have access to Lenovo’s campus program, you can get our review configuration for 900 Euros (incl. Windows 11), but the regular price of 1,050 Euros is Lenovo’s online shop is still very fair. Please see our comprehensive review of the new ThinkPad E16 G3 for more information. More articles related to this device Lenovo ThinkPad E16 G3-21SSS00F00 (ThinkPad E16 G3 Series) Related Articles Editor of the original article: Andreas Osthoff – Managing Editor Business Laptops – 1843 articles published on Notebookcheck since 2013 I grew up with modern consumer electronics and my first computer was a Commodore C64, which encouraged my interest in building my own systems. I started working as a review editor for Notebookcheck during my dual studies at Siemens. Currently, I am mainly responsible for dealing with business laptops and mobile workstations. It’s a great experience to be able to review the latest devices and technologies and then compare them with each other. Andreas Osthoff, 2025-07-20 (Update: 2025-07-20) Read More

Specifications Processor Intel Core 7 240H 10 x 1.8 – 5.2 GHz, 74 W PL2 / Short Burst, 50 W PL1 / Sustained, Raptor Lake-H Refresh Memory 16 GB  , DDR-5600, Samsung, 46-45-45-89, Single-Channel Display 16.00 inch 16:10, 1920 x 1200 pixel 142 PPI, MNG007QX2-2, IPS, glossy: no, 144 Hz Mainboard Intel Raptor Lake-P PCH Soundcard Intel Raptor Lake-P/U/H PCH – cAVS Connections 3 USB 3.0 / 3.1 Gen1, USB-C Power Delivery (PD), 1 HDMI, 1 DisplayPort, Audio Connections: 3.5 mm combo Networking Realtek RTL8852BE (b/g/n = Wi-Fi 4/ac = Wi-Fi 5/ax = Wi-Fi 6/), Bluetooth 5.3 Size height x width x depth (in mm): 22 x 357 x 250.7 ( = 0.87 x 14.06 x 9.87 in) Battery 63 Wh Lithium-Polymer Operating System Microsoft Windows 11 Home Camera Webcam: 1080p30Primary Camera: 2.1 MPix Additional features Speakers: Stereo, Keyboard: Chiclet, Keyboard Light: yes, MyAsus, 12 Months Warranty Weight 1.974 kg ( = 69.63 oz / 4.35 pounds), Power Supply: 503 g ( = 17.74 oz / 1.11 pounds) Price comparison Average Score: 74.25% – averageAverage of 2 scores (from 1 reviews) price: 80%, performance: 72%, features: 51%, display: 71% mobility: 77%, workmanship: 77%, ergonomy: 79%, emissions: 88% Reviews for the Asus V16 V3607V 70% Asus Gaming V16 Review: Strong Battery, Mid-Range PerformanceSource: NDTV Gadgets The Asus Gaming V16 is a good buy for those venturing into the world of gaming, but not if you’re a seasoned gamer. If you’re on a budget and don’t do a lot of gaming, this might be a good option. It’s got a portable design with a decent build, a 16-inch high refresh rate display, a good keyboard, and excellent battery life. And, for those short gaming sessions between study or work, you’ve got the GeForce RTX 4050 GPU. At a starting price of Rs. 82,990, the Gaming V16 should certainly be on your list of budget gaming laptops. Single Review, online available, Medium, Date: 03/30/2025Rating: Total score: 70% price: 80% performance: 70% display: 70% mobility: 80% workmanship: 80% Comment NVIDIA GeForce RTX 3050 6GB Laptop GPU: Mid-range gaming laptop graphics card based on the Ampere GA107 chip. Offers 2560 shaders and is offered in different TGP (power consumption) variants from 35 to 80 Watt with different clock speeds and therefore performance. Refresh of the RTX 3050 with 6GB, higher shader count but a reduced memory bandwidth of 96Bit. With these GPUs you are able to play modern and demanding games fluently at medium detail settings and HD resolution. » Further information can be found in our Comparison of Mobile Graphics Cards and the corresponding Benchmark List. Core 7 240H: Alder Lake based mobile CPU with 6 performance cores and 4 efficient cores. The performance cores offer hyper threading for 16 threads in total. The CPU runs at 1.8 to 5.2 GHz. Compared to the older Core i7-13620H, the Core 7 240H offers higher clock speeds (especially Turbo Boost) and support for DDR5-5600.» Further information can be found in our Comparison of Mobile Processsors. 16.00″: 15-inch display variants are the standard and are used for more than half of all laptops. The reason for the popularity of mid-sized displays is that this size is reasonably easy on the eyes, often allows high resolutions and thus offers rich details on the screen, yet does not consume too much power and the devices can still be reasonably compact – simply the standard compromise. » To find out how fine a display is, see our DPI List. Asus: ASUSTeK Computer Inc. is a major Taiwanese computer hardware manufacturer based in Taipei, founded in 1989. Under the Asus brand name, the company manufactures a wide range of products, including laptops, desktops, motherboards, graphics cards, monitors, smartphones and networking equipment, complete systems and PC components for end users. Under the ROG (Republic of Gamers) brand name, ASUS manufactures gaming laptops known by gamers for their powerful specifications, dedicated graphics cards, high refresh rate displays and advanced cooling systems. Beyond gaming, a wide range of notebooks are offered for different needs and budgets, from ultra-slim and lightweight ultrabooks to versatile 2-in-1 convertibles and budget-friendly options. In 2023, Asus had a 7% global market share of the PC market. Customer satisfaction with ASUS notebooks concerns performance, the features, and the good price-performance ratio of ASUS notebooks. However, as with any brand, there are occasional reports of problems such as overheating, driver compatibility, or build quality issues. 74.25%: This rating is poor. More than three quarters of the models are rated better. That is rather not a purchase recommendation. Even if verbal ratings in this area do not sound that bad (“sufficient” or “satisfactory”), they are usually euphemisms that disguise a classification as a below-average laptop. » Further information can be found in our Notebook Purchase Guide. Read More