ContentSproute

Nubia RedMagic 10S Pro Smartphone Review: Top hardware for a fast-paced gamer thumbnail

Nubia RedMagic 10S Pro Smartphone Review: Top hardware for a fast-paced gamer

The RedMagic 10S Pro is a powerful smartphone for anyone on the lookout for fast hardware and enjoys gaming. With its responsive display and additional sensor buttons, it offers real added value in these areas. 

There are no cutouts in the display for the selfie camera, which lends to an uninterrupted viewing experience; the rear cameras sit absolutely flush with the body as well — neither of which can be found on any other competitor in this price range.

The fast Snapdragon 8 Elite Leading Version nominally makes the Nubia RedMagic 10S Pro the fastest smartphone. However, it is often unable to exploit this advantage as the 10S Pro cannot always cope with the heat generated despite the fan being active. Moreover, the surface temperatures can rise quite high.

A few compromises also have to be made in everyday use, as the RedMagic 10S Pro does not support eSIM or wireless charging. Although the update cycle has been extended, it is still not optimal, and the cameras are only in the mid-range.

Pros

+ under-interference-free and responsive display

+ high performance

+ fast memory

+ additional sensor buttons

+ long battery life

Cons

low IP certification

neither eSIM support nor wireless charging

irregular updates

can get very hot

The tested variant of the Nubia RedMagic 10S Pro can be purchased for $799 directly from the manufacturer’s online store, which also stocks other color and memory variants. 

Alternatively, the 10S Pro can also be had from Amazon DE and Amazon US.

Amazon Logo

$949.00

REDMAGIC 10S Pro Smartphone 5G, 144Hz Gaming Phone, 6.85″ 1.5K AMOLED, Under Display Camera, Android Phone, 16+512GB, Dual-Sim, Unlocked Phone Silver

The RedMagic 10S Pro is an upgrade of the RedMagic 10 Pro and offers a faster SoC, RAM and internal memory as well as nominally more powerful camera sensors.

It starts at an RRP of 649 euros for the entry-level model with 12/256 GB and climbs up to 999 euros for the model with 24 GB RAM and 1 TB internal storage.

Display

6.85 inch 19.89:9, 2688 x 1216 pixel 431 PPI, Capacitive Touchscreen, AMOLED, Corning Gorilla Glass, glossy: yes, HDR, 144 Hz

Storage

512 GB UFS 4.1 Flash, 512 GB 

, 472.21 GB free

Connections

1 USB 3.1 Gen2, USB-C Power Delivery (PD), 1 HDMI, 1 DisplayPort, 1 Infrared, Audio Connections: 3.5mm, 1 Fingerprint Reader, NFC, Brightness Sensor, Sensors: accelerometer, gyro, proximity, compass, G-Sensor, OTG, IR-Blaster

Networking

Wi-Fi 7 (a/b/g/n = Wi-Fi 4/ac = Wi-Fi 5/ax = Wi-Fi 6/ Wi-Fi 6E 6 GHz be = Wi-Fi 7), Bluetooth 5.4, 2G (850, 900, 1800, 1900 MHz), 3G (Band 1, 2, 4, 5, 6, 8, 19), LTE (Band 1, 2, 3, 4, 5, 7, 8, 12, 17, 18, 19, 20, 26, 28a, 28b, 34, 38, 39, 40, 41, 42, 66), 5G-Sub6 (Band 1, 2, 3, 5, 7, 8, 20, 26, 28, 38, 40, 41, 66, 71, 77, 78), Dual SIM, LTE, 5G, GPS

Size

height x width x depth (in mm): 8.9 x 163.42 x 76.14 ( = 0.35 x 6.43 x 3 in)

Battery

7050 mAh Lithium-Ion, Dual Cell, Battery life in cycles: 1200

Charging

fast charging / Quickcharge

Operating System

Android 15

Camera

Primary Camera: 50 MPix (f/1.88, 23 mm, OV50E40, 1/1.55″, OIS) + 50 MPix (f/2.0, 13 mm, OV50D40, 1/2.88″) + 2 MPix; Camera2-API-Level: Level 3
Secondary Camera: 16 MPix (f/2.0, OV16EQ, 1/2.77″)

Additional features

Speakers: Dual, Keyboard: OnScreen, 80W-Charger, USB-C-Cabel, SIM-Tool, RedMagicOS 10.5, 12 Months Warranty, Shoulder Trigger Buttons (520 Hz) | Bluetooth Audio Codecs: SBC, AAC, aptX, aptX HD, aptX Adaptive, aptX TWS+, LDAC, Opus, LC3, LHDC | GNSS: GPS (L1, L2, L5), Glonass (L1), BeiDou (B1l, B1C, B2a, B2b), Galileo (E1, E5a, E5b) | HDR: HLG, HDR10 | DRM Widevine L1 | IP54 | FAN up to 23000 RPM | max. charging speed: 80 W (wired)

Weight

229 g ( = 8.08 oz / 0.5 pounds) ( = 0 oz / 0 pounds)

Note: The manufacturer may use components from different suppliers including display panels, drives or memory sticks with similar specifications.

The RedMagic 10S Pro once again uses the bezel design of its predecessor and comes in three new color options: Nightfall, Dusk, and Moonlight. The workmanship is of a high quality, and the phone impresses with narrow display edges although it creaks slightly when twisted. 

The cameras are located under the rear glass cover, so there is no camera bump. Unfortunately, the gaming phone is neither dustproof nor waterproof and only comes with an IP54 certification.

The onboard features are impressive. The RedMagic 10S Pro is powered by the Snapdragon 8 Elite Leading Version, with a higher peak clock rate for both the CPU and GPU than the standard variant. 

In addition, there is state-of-the-art UFS 4.1 storage, LPDDR5T RAM, and USB 3.2 Gen2 connectivity — that’s as good as it gets in these areas at the moment. There are also two sensor buttons that can be used for control in games.

The integrated fan can be optionally activated, but it hardly makes any difference. With noise levels up to 44 dB(A), the fan can get quite loud.

The RedMagic 10S Pro offers good communication hardware that includes 5G and Wi-Fi 7, but the voice quality is only average and there is no eSIM support. The linear vibration motor provides crisp feedback, and an optical fingerprint sensor is available for biometric security.

The RedMagic 10S Pro comes with Google’s Android 15 and RedMagicOS 10.5. In the EU and the UK, the update period is extended to five years (three years, otherwise), which is still below the EU requirements. At the time of testing, the security updates were up to date as of May 1, 2025.

The outer packaging contains a lot of plastic and RedMagic does not provide any information on sustainability. In the EU energy label the battery is indicated as replaceable, but this cannot be done by the user as Nubia offers neither suitable spare parts nor instructions.

The front camera of the RedMagic 10S Pro is located under the display, allowing an uninterrupted view of the content. However, the quality is rather mediocre, with many details drowning in a coarse sea of pixels while the photos are highly saturated.

Although the rear lenses offer high resolutions for the most part, the image quality here is rather mediocre and at the level of a mid-range smartphone. Zoom shots are not good even at low magnification levels and a 10x zoom is already the end of the line.

Videos are recorded on the front camera in full HD 30 fps. The main camera on the back allows recordings in 8K 30 fps and 4k 60 fps among others.

RedMagic 10S ProOppo Find X8 Ultra
RedMagic 10S Pro
Oppo Find X8 Ultra
ColorChecker

8.8 ∆E

8.7 ∆E

5.7 ∆E

9.7 ∆E

7.9 ∆E

5.4 ∆E

9.6 ∆E

9.6 ∆E

11.9 ∆E

5.6 ∆E

5.7 ∆E

5.7 ∆E

8.5 ∆E

9.7 ∆E

13.2 ∆E

3.9 ∆E

11.6 ∆E

13.4 ∆E

6.4 ∆E

2.8 ∆E

7 ∆E

6.7 ∆E

2.2 ∆E

4.1 ∆E

ColorChecker Nubia RedMagic 10S Pro: 7.66 ∆E min: 2.23 – max: 13.36 ∆E

The 6.85-inch AMOLED display of the RedMagic 10S Pro has a refresh rate of up to 144 Hz and a multi-touch sampling rate of up to 960 Hz. The resolution is high, ensuring an appealing pixel density. The factory color calibration is impressive as well.

The brightness of the panel is high but does not come close to the top values of the competition. The minimum luminosity is also slightly higher.

The display flickers at a basic frequency of 120 Hz, but also uses high-frequency PWM dimming, which flickers at 2,083 Hz at minimum display brightness and should therefore be comparatively easy on the eyes.

1414
cd/m²
1436
cd/m²
1516
cd/m²
1412
cd/m²
1442
cd/m²
1539
cd/m²
1403
cd/m²
1421
cd/m²
1497
cd/m²

Distribution of brightness

tested with X-Rite i1Pro 3

Maximum: 1539 cd/m² (Nits) Average: 1453.3 cd/m² Minimum: 3.44 cd/m²
Brightness Distribution: 91 %
Center on Battery: 1442 cd/m²
Contrast: ∞:1 (Black: 0 cd/m²)
ΔE ColorChecker Calman: 2 | ∀{0.5-29.43 Ø4.82}
ΔE Greyscale Calman: 2.3 | ∀{0.09-98 Ø5.1}
98.6% sRGB (Calman 2D)
Gamma: 2.38
CCT: 6284 K

Nubia RedMagic 10S Pro
AMOLED, 2688×1216, 6.9″
Asus ROG Phone 9 Pro
AMOLED, 2400×1080, 6.8″
Samsung Galaxy S25
AMOLED, 2340×1080, 6.2″
Xiaomi 15
OLED, 2670×1200, 6.4″
Screen

25%

-17%

0%

Brightness middle

1442

1682

17%

1301

-10%

1021

-29%

Brightness

1453

1685

16%

1311

-10%

1018

-30%

Brightness Distribution

91

97

7%

98

8%

98

8%

Black Level *
Colorchecker dE 2000 *

2

1.1

45%

3.1

-55%

1.3

35%

Colorchecker dE 2000 max. *

3.3

2.1

36%

4.4

-33%

2.9

12%

Greyscale dE 2000 *

2.3

1.7

26%

2.3

-0%

2.2

4%

Gamma

2.38 92%

2.27 97%

2.01 109%

2.25 98%

CCT

6284 103%

6581 99%

6454 101%

6658 98%

* … smaller is better

Screen Flickering / PWM (Pulse-Width Modulation)

To dim the screen, some notebooks will simply cycle the backlight on and off in rapid succession – a method called Pulse Width Modulation (PWM) . This cycling frequency should ideally be undetectable to the human eye. If said frequency is too low, users with sensitive eyes may experience strain or headaches or even notice the flickering altogether.

Screen flickering / PWM detected 120 Hz
Amplitude: 13.92 %
Secondary Frequency: 2083 Hz

The display backlight flickers at 120 Hz (worst case, e.g., utilizing PWM) .

The frequency of 120 Hz is very low, so the flickering may cause eyestrain and headaches after extended use.

In comparison: 53 % of all tested devices do not use PWM to dim the display. If PWM was detected, an average of 8301 (minimum: 5 – maximum: 343500) Hz was measured.

Display Response Times

Display response times show how fast the screen is able to change from one color to the next. Slow response times can lead to afterimages and can cause moving objects to appear blurry (ghosting). Gamers of fast-paced 3D titles should pay special attention to fast response times.

       Response Time Black to White
1 ms … rise ↗ and fall ↘ combined ↗ 0.49 ms rise
↘ 0.5135 ms fall
The screen shows very fast response rates in our tests and should be very well suited for fast-paced gaming.
In comparison, all tested devices range from 0.1 (minimum) to 240 (maximum) ms. » 3 % of all devices are better.
This means that the measured response time is better than the average of all tested devices (20.4 ms).
       Response Time 50% Grey to 80% Grey
1.08 ms … rise ↗ and fall ↘ combined ↗ 0.468 ms rise
↘ 0.609 ms fall
The screen shows very fast response rates in our tests and should be very well suited for fast-paced gaming.
In comparison, all tested devices range from 0.165 (minimum) to 636 (maximum) ms. » 3 % of all devices are better.
This means that the measured response time is better than the average of all tested devices (32 ms).
Networking
Nubia RedMagic 10S Pro
Wi-Fi 7
iperf3 transmit AXE11000 6GHz





1851 (min: 1823) MBit/s ∼99%

iperf3 receive AXE11000 6GHz





1849 (min: 1740) MBit/s ∼100%

Asus ROG Phone 9 Pro
Wi-Fi 7
iperf3 transmit AXE11000





993 (min: 953) MBit/s ∼94%

iperf3 receive AXE11000





565 (min: 427) MBit/s ∼48%

iperf3 transmit AXE11000 6GHz





1864 (min: 929) MBit/s ∼100%

iperf3 receive AXE11000 6GHz





1549 (min: 1517) MBit/s ∼84%

Samsung Galaxy S25
Wi-Fi 7
iperf3 transmit AXE11000





1058 (min: 518) MBit/s ∼100%

iperf3 receive AXE11000





1167 (min: 1006) MBit/s ∼100%

iperf3 transmit AXE11000 6GHz





1210 (min: 998) MBit/s ∼65%

iperf3 receive AXE11000 6GHz





1201 (min: 1184) MBit/s ∼65%

Xiaomi 15
Wi-Fi 7
iperf3 transmit AXE11000





876 (min: 445) MBit/s ∼83%

iperf3 receive AXE11000





871 (min: 785) MBit/s ∼75%

iperf3 transmit AXE11000 6GHz





1386 (min: 628) MBit/s ∼74%

iperf3 receive AXE11000 6GHz





1793 (min: 1671) MBit/s ∼97%

Average Wi-Fi 7
 
iperf3 transmit AXE11000






1015 (min: 556) MBit/s ∼96%

iperf3 receive AXE11000






1014 (min: 565) MBit/s ∼87%

iperf3 transmit AXE11000 6GHz






1534 (min: 563) MBit/s ∼82%

iperf3 receive AXE11000 6GHz






1522 (min: 451) MBit/s ∼82%

Average of class Smartphone
 
iperf3 transmit AXE11000






724 (min: 49.8) MBit/s ∼68%

iperf3 receive AXE11000






736 (min: 52) MBit/s ∼63%

iperf3 transmit AXE11000 6GHz






1361 (min: 508) MBit/s ∼73%

iperf3 receive AXE11000 6GHz






1402 (min: 451) MBit/s ∼76%

0501001502002503003504004505005506006507007508008509009501000105011001150120012501300135014001450150015501600165017001750180018501900Tooltip
Geekbench 6.4
Single-Core
Asus ROG Phone 9 Pro
Qualcomm Snapdragon 8 Elite, Adreno 830, 24576


3215 Points +3%

Nubia RedMagic 10S Pro
Qualcomm Snapdragon 8 Elite, Adreno 830, 16384


3112 Points

Samsung Galaxy S25
Qualcomm Snapdragon 8 Elite for Galaxy, Adreno 830, 12288


3087 Points -1%

Average Qualcomm Snapdragon 8 Elite
  (2309 – 3228, n=24)





3042 Points -2%

Xiaomi 15
Qualcomm Snapdragon 8 Elite, Adreno 830, 12288


3001 Points -4%

Average of class Smartphone
  (196 – 3479, n=204, last 2 years)





1635 Points -47%

Multi-Core
Asus ROG Phone 9 Pro
Qualcomm Snapdragon 8 Elite, Adreno 830, 24576


10323 Points +6%

Samsung Galaxy S25
Qualcomm Snapdragon 8 Elite for Galaxy, Adreno 830, 12288


9776 Points +1%

Nubia RedMagic 10S Pro
Qualcomm Snapdragon 8 Elite, Adreno 830, 16384


9724 Points

Xiaomi 15
Qualcomm Snapdragon 8 Elite, Adreno 830, 12288


9202 Points -5%

Average Qualcomm Snapdragon 8 Elite
  (7656 – 10401, n=24)





9158 Points -6%

Average of class Smartphone
  (830 – 10401, n=204, last 2 years)





4736 Points -51%

3DMark
Wild Life Unlimited Score
Nubia RedMagic 10S Pro
Qualcomm Snapdragon 8 Elite, Adreno 830, 16384


28053 Points

Samsung Galaxy S25
Qualcomm Snapdragon 8 Elite for Galaxy, Adreno 830, 12288


27327 Points -3%

Xiaomi 15
Qualcomm Snapdragon 8 Elite, Adreno 830, 12288


24960 Points -11%

Average Qualcomm Snapdragon 8 Elite
  (19436 – 28053, n=21)





24130 Points -14%

Asus ROG Phone 9 Pro
Qualcomm Snapdragon 8 Elite, Adreno 830, 24576


21065 Points -25%

Average of class Smartphone
  (271 – 28053, n=187, last 2 years)





10056 Points -64%

Steel Nomad Light Score
Nubia RedMagic 10S Pro
Qualcomm Snapdragon 8 Elite, Adreno 830, 16384


2697 Points

Average Qualcomm Snapdragon 8 Elite
  (1883 – 2849, n=23)





2374 Points -12%

Xiaomi 15
Qualcomm Snapdragon 8 Elite, Adreno 830, 12288


2362 Points -12%

Asus ROG Phone 9 Pro
Qualcomm Snapdragon 8 Elite, Adreno 830, 24576


2047 Points -24%

Average of class Smartphone
  (132 – 2849, n=108, last 2 years)





1277 Points -53%

Samsung Galaxy S25
Qualcomm Snapdragon 8 Elite for Galaxy, Adreno 830, 12288


Points -100%

Steel Nomad Light Unlimited Score
Nubia RedMagic 10S Pro
Qualcomm Snapdragon 8 Elite, Adreno 830, 16384


2672 Points

Average Qualcomm Snapdragon 8 Elite
  (1697 – 2838, n=23)





2364 Points -12%

Xiaomi 15
Qualcomm Snapdragon 8 Elite, Adreno 830, 12288


2258 Points -15%

Asus ROG Phone 9 Pro
Qualcomm Snapdragon 8 Elite, Adreno 830, 24576


2039 Points -24%

Average of class Smartphone
  (132 – 2838, n=107, last 2 years)





1238 Points -54%

GFXBench
on screen Aztec Ruins Normal Tier Onscreen
Asus ROG Phone 9 Pro
Qualcomm Snapdragon 8 Elite, Adreno 830, 24576


166 fps +177%

Xiaomi 15
Qualcomm Snapdragon 8 Elite, Adreno 830, 12288


120 fps +100%

Samsung Galaxy S25
Qualcomm Snapdragon 8 Elite for Galaxy, Adreno 830, 12288


120 fps +100%

Average Qualcomm Snapdragon 8 Elite
  (50 – 166, n=22)





96 fps +60%

Nubia RedMagic 10S Pro
Qualcomm Snapdragon 8 Elite, Adreno 830, 16384


60 fps

Average of class Smartphone
  (6.2 – 166, n=201, last 2 years)





57.1 fps -5%

1920×1080 Aztec Ruins Normal Tier Offscreen
Samsung Galaxy S25
Qualcomm Snapdragon 8 Elite for Galaxy, Adreno 830, 12288


279 fps +68%

Xiaomi 15
Qualcomm Snapdragon 8 Elite, Adreno 830, 12288


274 fps +65%

Asus ROG Phone 9 Pro
Qualcomm Snapdragon 8 Elite, Adreno 830, 24576


263 fps +58%

Average Qualcomm Snapdragon 8 Elite
  (166 – 332, n=22)





249 fps +50%

Nubia RedMagic 10S Pro
Qualcomm Snapdragon 8 Elite, Adreno 830, 16384


166 fps

Average of class Smartphone
  (3.4 – 332, n=201, last 2 years)





107.4 fps -35%

on screen Aztec Ruins High Tier Onscreen
Asus ROG Phone 9 Pro
Qualcomm Snapdragon 8 Elite, Adreno 830, 24576


144 fps +144%

Samsung Galaxy S25
Qualcomm Snapdragon 8 Elite for Galaxy, Adreno 830, 12288


120 fps +103%

Xiaomi 15
Qualcomm Snapdragon 8 Elite, Adreno 830, 12288


115 fps +95%

Average Qualcomm Snapdragon 8 Elite
  (45 – 144, n=22)





83.4 fps +41%

Nubia RedMagic 10S Pro
Qualcomm Snapdragon 8 Elite, Adreno 830, 16384


59 fps

Average of class Smartphone
  (0.85 – 144, n=202, last 2 years)





44.8 fps -24%

2560×1440 Aztec Ruins High Tier Offscreen
Samsung Galaxy S25
Qualcomm Snapdragon 8 Elite for Galaxy, Adreno 830, 12288


118 fps +103%

Asus ROG Phone 9 Pro
Qualcomm Snapdragon 8 Elite, Adreno 830, 24576


112 fps +93%

Xiaomi 15
Qualcomm Snapdragon 8 Elite, Adreno 830, 12288


100 fps +72%

Average Qualcomm Snapdragon 8 Elite
  (58 – 118, n=22)





95.8 fps +65%

Nubia RedMagic 10S Pro
Qualcomm Snapdragon 8 Elite, Adreno 830, 16384


58 fps

Average of class Smartphone
  (1.2 – 129, n=201, last 2 years)





42 fps -28%

3840×2160 4K Aztec Ruins High Tier Offscreen
Samsung Galaxy S25
Qualcomm Snapdragon 8 Elite for Galaxy, Adreno 830, 12288


52 fps +100%

Asus ROG Phone 9 Pro
Qualcomm Snapdragon 8 Elite, Adreno 830, 24576


52 fps +100%

Xiaomi 15
Qualcomm Snapdragon 8 Elite, Adreno 830, 12288


47 fps +81%

Average Qualcomm Snapdragon 8 Elite
  (26 – 53, n=22)





44.4 fps +71%

Nubia RedMagic 10S Pro
Qualcomm Snapdragon 8 Elite, Adreno 830, 16384


26 fps

Average of class Smartphone
  (0.54 – 53, n=202, last 2 years)





19.5 fps -25%

Octane V2 – Total Score
Samsung Galaxy S25
Qualcomm Snapdragon 8 Elite for Galaxy, Adreno 830, 12288


95809 Points +276%

Xiaomi 15
Qualcomm Snapdragon 8 Elite, Adreno 830, 12288


78653 Points +208%

Asus ROG Phone 9 Pro
Qualcomm Snapdragon 8 Elite, Adreno 830, 24576


72825 Points +186%

Average Qualcomm Snapdragon 8 Elite
  (25448 – 95506, n=21)





70318 Points +176%

Average of class Smartphone
  (2228 – 100368, n=203, last 2 years)





45541 Points +79%

Nubia RedMagic 10S Pro
Qualcomm Snapdragon 8 Elite, Adreno 830, 16384


25502 Points

Geekbench AI
Single Precision NPU 1.4
Average of class Smartphone
  (231 – 1131, n=17, last 2 years)





532 Points +75%

Average Qualcomm Snapdragon 8 Elite
  (246 – 628, n=5)





464 Points +53%

Nubia RedMagic 10S Pro
Qualcomm Snapdragon 8 Elite, Adreno 830, 16384


304 Points

Half Precision NPU 1.4
Average of class Smartphone
  (231 – 4555, n=17, last 2 years)





1133 Points +191%

Average Qualcomm Snapdragon 8 Elite
  (249 – 633, n=5)





471 Points +21%

Nubia RedMagic 10S Pro
Qualcomm Snapdragon 8 Elite, Adreno 830, 16384


390 Points

Quantized NPU 1.4
Average of class Smartphone
  (133 – 4549, n=17, last 2 years)





1785 Points +193%

Average Qualcomm Snapdragon 8 Elite
  (508 – 1475, n=5)





991 Points +62%

Nubia RedMagic 10S Pro
Qualcomm Snapdragon 8 Elite, Adreno 830, 16384


610 Points

CrossMark
Overall
Asus ROG Phone 9 Pro
Qualcomm Snapdragon 8 Elite, Adreno 830, 24576


2044 Points +88%

Average Qualcomm Snapdragon 8 Elite
  (1064 – 2674, n=17)





1855 Points +70%

Xiaomi 15
Qualcomm Snapdragon 8 Elite, Adreno 830, 12288


1718 Points +58%

Nubia RedMagic 10S Pro
Qualcomm Snapdragon 8 Elite, Adreno 830, 16384


1089 Points

Average of class Smartphone
  (187 – 2674, n=139, last 2 years)





1056 Points -3%

Samsung Galaxy S25
Qualcomm Snapdragon 8 Elite for Galaxy, Adreno 830, 12288


Points -100%

Productivity
Asus ROG Phone 9 Pro
Qualcomm Snapdragon 8 Elite, Adreno 830, 24576


1562 Points +100%

Average Qualcomm Snapdragon 8 Elite
  (774 – 2084, n=17)





1483 Points +90%

Xiaomi 15
Qualcomm Snapdragon 8 Elite, Adreno 830, 12288


1392 Points +78%

Average of class Smartphone
  (198 – 2084, n=139, last 2 years)





1024 Points +31%

Nubia RedMagic 10S Pro
Qualcomm Snapdragon 8 Elite, Adreno 830, 16384


782 Points

Creativity
Asus ROG Phone 9 Pro
Qualcomm Snapdragon 8 Elite, Adreno 830, 24576


1611 Points +64%

Average Qualcomm Snapdragon 8 Elite
  (923 – 1756, n=17)





1394 Points +42%

Xiaomi 15
Qualcomm Snapdragon 8 Elite, Adreno 830, 12288


1339 Points +36%

Nubia RedMagic 10S Pro
Qualcomm Snapdragon 8 Elite, Adreno 830, 16384


983 Points

Average of class Smartphone
  (163 – 1962, n=139, last 2 years)





952 Points -3%

Responsiveness
Asus ROG Phone 9 Pro
Qualcomm Snapdragon 8 Elite, Adreno 830, 24576


9361 Points +135%

Average Qualcomm Snapdragon 8 Elite
  (3986 – 13042, n=17)





8000 Points +101%

Xiaomi 15
Qualcomm Snapdragon 8 Elite, Adreno 830, 12288


6805 Points +71%

Nubia RedMagic 10S Pro
Qualcomm Snapdragon 8 Elite, Adreno 830, 16384


3986 Points

Average of class Smartphone
  (239 – 13042, n=139, last 2 years)





2053 Points -48%

  54.9 °C
131 F
55 °C
131 F
53.6 °C
128 F
 
  54.8 °C
131 F
54.2 °C
130 F
50.6 °C
123 F
 
  54.7 °C
130 F
53.7 °C
129 F
50.4 °C
123 F
 
Maximum: 55 °C = 131 F
Average: 53.5 °C = 128 F
46.6 °C
116 F
51.9 °C
125 F
53.4 °C
128 F
46.1 °C
115 F
49.6 °C
121 F
52.6 °C
127 F
46.2 °C
115 F
51.1 °C
124 F
50.9 °C
124 F
Maximum: 53.4 °C = 128 F
Average: 49.8 °C = 122 F

Power Supply (max.)  32.7 °C = 91 F | Room Temperature 22 °C = 72 F | Fluke t3000FC (calibrated) & Voltcraft IR-260

(-) The average temperature for the upper side under maximal load is 53.5 °C / 128 F, compared to the average of 32.9 °C / 91 F for the devices in the class Smartphone.
(-) The maximum temperature on the upper side is 55 °C / 131 F, compared to the average of 35.2 °C / 95 F, ranging from 21.9 to 247 °C for the class Smartphone.
(-) The bottom heats up to a maximum of 53.4 °C / 128 F, compared to the average of 33.9 °C / 93 F
(+) In idle usage, the average temperature for the upper side is 30.6 °C / 87 F, compared to the device average of 32.9 °C / 91 F.

3DMark
Wild Life Stress Test Stability
Asus ROG Phone 9 Pro
Adreno 830, SD 8 Elite, 1 TB UFS 4.0 Flash


90.5 % +13%

Nubia RedMagic 10S Pro
Adreno 830, SD 8 Elite, 512 GB UFS 4.1 Flash


80.4 %

Xiaomi 15
Adreno 830, SD 8 Elite, 512 GB UFS 4.0 Flash


66.3 % -18%

Samsung Galaxy S25
Adreno 830, SD 8 Elite f. Galaxy, 256 GB UFS 4.0 Flash


52.7 % -34%

Steel Nomad Light Stress Test Stability
Asus ROG Phone 9 Pro
Adreno 830, SD 8 Elite, 1 TB UFS 4.0 Flash


99.2 % +23%

Asus ROG Phone 9 Pro
Adreno 830, SD 8 Elite, 1 TB UFS 4.0 Flash


89.8 % +11%

Nubia RedMagic 10S Pro
Adreno 830, SD 8 Elite, 512 GB UFS 4.1 Flash


80.8 %

Xiaomi 15
Adreno 830, SD 8 Elite, 512 GB UFS 4.0 Flash


69.5 % -14%

0102030405060708090100110120130140150Tooltip

Nubia RedMagic 10S Pro Adreno 830, SD 8 Elite, 512 GB UFS 4.1 Flash; Wild Life Stress Test Stability: Ø136.1 (123.3-153.4)

Asus ROG Phone 9 Pro Adreno 830, SD 8 Elite, 1 TB UFS 4.0 Flash; Wild Life Stress Test Stability: Ø118.2 (112.9-124.7)

Samsung Galaxy S25 Adreno 830, SD 8 Elite f. Galaxy, 256 GB UFS 4.0 Flash; Wild Life Stress Test Stability; 0.0.0.0: Ø92.8 (76.2-144.6)

Xiaomi 15 Adreno 830, SD 8 Elite, 512 GB UFS 4.0 Flash; Wild Life Stress Test Stability; 0.0.0.0: Ø101.2 (87.7-132.2)

Nubia RedMagic 10S Pro Adreno 830, SD 8 Elite, 512 GB UFS 4.1 Flash; Steel Nomad Light Stress Test Stability; 1.1.1.3: Ø18.5 (16.3-20.2)

Asus ROG Phone 9 Pro Adreno 830, SD 8 Elite, 1 TB UFS 4.0 Flash; Steel Nomad Light Stress Test Stability; 1.1.1.3, with Fan: Ø15.2 (15.2-15.3)

Asus ROG Phone 9 Pro Adreno 830, SD 8 Elite, 1 TB UFS 4.0 Flash; Steel Nomad Light Stress Test Stability; 1.1.1.3: Ø15 (13.7-15.3)

Xiaomi 15 Adreno 830, SD 8 Elite, 512 GB UFS 4.0 Flash; Steel Nomad Light Stress Test Stability; 1.1.1.3: Ø13.8 (12.2-17.6)

dB(A) 0102030405060708090Deep BassMiddle BassHigh BassLower RangeMidsHigher MidsLower HighsMid HighsUpper HighsSuper Highs2040.843.62530.126.83126.726.24027.828.95035.930.46328.329.78028.825.110027.325.612517.237.816016.347.120014.74425012.85431513.254.940012.655.950012.356.863012.263.480012.168.8100012.374.3125012.376160012.176.620001280.2250012.278.131501380.6400013.180.4500013.178.1630013.573.9800013.472.21000013.467.21250013.566.11600013.356.8SPL2589.1N0.671.2median 13.1median 68.8Delta1.71132.429.633.833.217.833.321.232.530.427.724.332.215.33916.844.714.153.913.457.113.15613.556.813.463.711.760.211.366.410.371.710.475.412.779.811.678.412.77913.881.114.379.713.78012.676.613.479.113.378.513.376.213.569.213.662.31450.225.190.10.683.5median 13.4median 75.40.79.7hearing rangehide median Pink Noise

Battery Runtime

WiFi Websurfing (Chrome 137) 24h 30min

The Nubia RedMagic 10S Pro is heavily specialized in gaming and has a strong feature set for this. In everyday use, however, we miss a few functions such as a higher IP certification, eSIM support, and wireless charging. The update supply is also not optimal.

Nubia RedMagic 10S Pro
– 08/12/2025 v8

Daniel Schmidt

Connectivity

68 / 69 → 99%

Games Performance

47 / 55 → 86%

Application Performance

80 / 85 → 94%

Smartphone – Weighted Average

CO2 Emissions
No Data

Materials
25%

Packaging
0%

Power Use
82.3%

Repairability
40%

Software Updates
83.5%

Recycle Logo Total Sustainability Score: 38.5%

Image

Model / Review

Price

Weight

Drive

Display

1.

86.1%

Nubia RedMagic 10S Pro

Nubia RedMagic 10S Pro
Qualcomm Snapdragon 8 Elite ⎘
Qualcomm Adreno 830 ⎘
16 GB Memory, 512 GB 
Amazon: $949.00
List Price: 799€
229 g 512 GB UFS 4.1 Flash 6.85″
2688×1216
431 PPI
AMOLED

2.

89.8%

Asus ROG Phone 9 Pro

Asus ROG Phone 9 Pro
Qualcomm Snapdragon 8 Elite ⎘
Qualcomm Adreno 830 ⎘
24 GB Memory, 1024 GB 
Amazon:
1. $10.79
Ibywind Screen Protector for…
2. $11.99
Guizzcg 2 Pack Screen Protec…
3. $313.09
Lkfyyds for ASUS ROG Phone 9…
List Price: 1499€
227 g 1 TB UFS 4.0 Flash 6.78″
2400×1080
388 PPI
AMOLED

3.

88.9%

Samsung Galaxy S25

Samsung Galaxy S25
Qualcomm Snapdragon 8 Elite for Galaxy ⎘
Qualcomm Adreno 830 ⎘
12 GB Memory, 256 GB 
Amazon:
1. $7.58
firtstnow 3 Pack Glass Scree…
2. $7.58
firtstnow 3 Pack Glass Scree…
3. $14.99
Super Fast Charger Type C, 2…
List Price: 899€
162 g 256 GB UFS 4.0 Flash 6.20″
2340×1080
416 PPI
AMOLED

4.

88.4%

Xiaomi 15

Xiaomi 15
Qualcomm Snapdragon 8 Elite ⎘
Qualcomm Adreno 830 ⎘
12 GB Memory, 512 GB 
Amazon:
1. $209.98
XIAOMI Watch S4 Smartwatch w…
2. $29.11
JOYFAR Portable-Charger-Powe…
3. $10.79
Ibywind Screen Protector For…
List Price: 760€
191 g 512 GB UFS 4.0 Flash 6.36″
2670×1200
460 PPI
OLED

Transparency

The selection of devices to be reviewed is made by our editorial team. The test sample was provided to the author as a loan by the manufacturer or retailer for the purpose of this review. The lender had no influence on this review, nor did the manufacturer receive a copy of this review before publication. There was no obligation to publish this review. We never accept compensation or payment in return for our reviews. As an independent media company, Notebookcheck is not subjected to the authority of manufacturers, retailers or publishers.

This is how Notebookcheck is testing

Every year, Notebookcheck independently reviews hundreds of laptops and smartphones using standardized procedures to ensure that all results are comparable. We have continuously developed our test methods for around 20 years and set industry standards in the process. In our test labs, high-quality measuring equipment is utilized by experienced technicians and editors. These tests involve a multi-stage validation process. Our complex rating system is based on hundreds of well-founded measurements and benchmarks, which maintains objectivity. Further information on our test methods can be found here.

Daniel Schmidt, 2025-08-18 (Update: 2025-08-18)

Read More

Scroll to Top